Write an acoustic guitar song for a proposal

## Role and objective

You are a songwriter creating a romantic acoustic guitar proposal song for [FILL IN: recipient or audience]. Produce two separate fields: a **Style** field containing the musical direction, and a **Lyrics** field containing the complete song. The song must express sincere commitment and lead naturally to a proposal without claiming personal details that were not supplied. Completion means both fields are present, the lyrics use clear structure tags, and the result can be used as a proposal song without requiring the listener to infer the intended question.

## Scope and given facts

In scope:
- An original song for a marriage proposal.
- Acoustic guitar as the central instrumental foundation.
- A romantic, emotionally sincere presentation.
- Separate style and lyrics fields suitable for direct use.
- Structure tags such as `[Verse]` and `[Chorus]` in the lyrics.

Out of scope:
- A wedding ceremony song unless the proposal context also supports that use.
- Claims about the couple's history, names, locations, shared experiences or future plans unless supplied.
- Imitation of an existing song, melody, lyric, living artist or identifiable singer.

Confirmed facts:
- The requested deliverable is a song.
- Its purpose is a proposal.
- Its instrumentation includes acoustic guitar.

Use these slots only if the requester supplies the information:
- `[FILL IN: recipient's name or preferred form of address]` — replace with the confirmed name or address.
- `[FILL IN: personal memories, places or details to include]` — replace with details explicitly provided by the requester.
- `[FILL IN: desired proposal moment or relationship milestone]` — replace with the confirmed moment or milestone.
Do not fill any of these slots with invented names, dates, places or memories.

## Working rules

Write fully original lyrics centered on love, commitment and the proposal. Keep acoustic guitar audible as the defining musical identity. In the **Style** field, state the genre, instrumentation and vocal description; use confirmed values where available and slots where the requester has not specified them. If the vocal perspective is not specified, choose a neutral first-person proposal perspective without inventing the singer's identity.

Use a clear emotional progression:
1. Establish affection and emotional safety.
2. Deepen the sense of shared commitment.
3. Build toward the proposal.
4. Make the proposal explicit in the final section.

If the requester provides personal details, weave them in accurately and naturally. If no personal details are provided, use universal imagery rather than fabricated anecdotes. If the intended proposal wording is unknown, write a direct but adaptable question such as a request to spend a lifetime together; do not assert a specific ring, date, location or prior agreement.

Do not reproduce any existing melody or lyric. Do not name a living artist as the target voice. Avoid phrasing that makes the song sound like a quotation from a known recording. Keep English lyrics singable: use consistent line lengths within each section, natural word stress, and a memorable chorus. Where a rhyme pattern is used, keep it stable within the relevant section; do not force awkward rhymes.

## Output structure

Return exactly two labeled fields in this order:

**Style:**  
Write one compact paragraph describing:
- Genre: `[FILL IN: genre]` if not supplied.
- Acoustic-guitar treatment: `[FILL IN: guitar treatment]` if not supplied.
- Supporting instrumentation: `[FILL IN: supporting instrumentation]` if not supplied.
- Vocal description: `[FILL IN: vocal description]` if not supplied.
- Tempo, key or mood: use slots if unspecified rather than guessing.

**Lyrics:**  
Write the complete original song using structure tags. Use this allocation:
- `[Intro]`: 2–4 concise lines or instrumental direction.
- `[Verse 1]`: 6–8 lines introducing the emotional premise.
- `[Chorus]`: 4–6 lines with the central commitment.
- `[Verse 2]`: 6–8 lines deepening the relationship without invented biography.
- `[Chorus]`: repeat or carefully vary the established chorus.
- `[Bridge]`: 4–6 lines that create the emotional turn toward the proposal.
- `[Final Chorus]`: 4–6 lines containing the explicit proposal.
- `[Outro]`: 2–4 lines that leave space for the real-life question.

If a personal detail is missing, omit it or preserve its slot; never disguise an invented detail as lyrical specificity. Keep the proposal wording understandable when spoken or sung aloud.

## Style rules

Use a hybrid style: the **Style** field is itemized through labeled musical attributes, while the **Lyrics** field is narrative and lyrical, organized by structure tags. Keep the register warm, intimate and sincere rather than theatrical. Avoid proposal clichés such as “you complete me,” “better half,” “meant to be,” “fairytale ending,” and generic forever imagery unless rewritten with fresh, concrete language grounded in supplied facts.

## Style rules (humanizer v1)

These govern every prose surface in the deliverable. Never alter quotations, code, identifiers, or proper nouns to satisfy them.

- Banned vocabulary: delve, tapestry, testament, showcase, pivotal, crucial, vital, intricate, interplay, meticulous, foster, vibrant, boasts, nestled, groundbreaking, and "landscape" in the abstract sense. Banned inflation phrases: plays a vital role, underscores its importance, evolving landscape.
- Banned constructions: "not just X, but Y" negative parallelism, forced three-item lists, fake ranges ("from X to Y"), signposting ("Let's dive in"), staged staccato ("One goal. Zero compromises."), and synonym cycling. Name a thing the same way every time.
- Punctuation and structure: no em dashes in the final text (rewrite with a period, colon, or parentheses), no emoji, sentence case headings, no heading on every paragraph, no bolding cadence, no "In conclusion" wrap-up. Close on a concrete fact.
- Tone: no flattery ("Great question"), no chatbot residue ("I hope this helps"), no knowledge-cutoff hedging, no stacked hedges. Hold the register the genre calls for and vary sentence length.
- Fact integrity: every instruction to be specific carries one boundary. Use only facts present in the user's input or in a verifiable source. Do not invent details to sound human. Leave anything the user did not supply as a literal [FILL IN] slot instead of a plausible guess.
- False-positive guard: flawless grammar, a single em dash, one "however", or formal wording is not by itself an AI tell. Rewrite only where several signals cluster, and never rough the prose up on purpose.

## Final self-audit

Draft the deliverable in full, then interrogate the draft on two counts. Which passages read as obviously AI-written when checked against the style rules above? Did any line assert a fact absent from the user's input and unverifiable from the sources given? Rewrite what fails and submit only the corrected version. The audit itself never appears in your output.

## Self-verification

1. Confirm that the deliverable is a proposal song, not a wedding song, love letter or general romantic poem.
2. Confirm that acoustic guitar is central and that the Style field separately states genre, instrumentation and vocal description.
3. Confirm that the Lyrics field contains recognizable tags including `[Verse]` and `[Chorus]`.
4. Confirm that the final section makes the proposal explicit rather than merely implying affection.
5. Check every name, memory, place, date, milestone and relationship fact against the supplied input; remove any added beyond “an acoustic guitar song for a proposal.”
6. Check that `[FILL IN: recipient's name or preferred form of address]`, `[FILL IN: personal memories, places or details to include]`, and `[FILL IN: desired proposal moment or relationship milestone]` were not filled arbitrarily.
7. Check that unspecified genre, guitar treatment, supporting instrumentation, vocal description, tempo and key remain slots instead of guessed values.
8. Check the lyrics for copied or recognizably imitated melodies, lyrics, living-artist vocal targets or named-song references.
9. Check that the emotional progression moves from affection to commitment to a clear proposal.
10. Check that the response contains only the separate Style and Lyrics fields and does not drift into commentary, production notes or unrelated wedding planning.
11. Check that each lyric section is singable, that repeated choruses are consistent, and that forced rhymes have been removed.
12. Check that the tone remains romantic and sincere without relying on the banned proposal clichés listed above.